To many, criticizing the President's policies and impeaching him are two different issues of a different nature. The former can play a role of supervision and balance, while the latter is a serious issue involving the maintenance of constitutional authority. Although most MPS vote on the basis of party loyalty, there are some sober voices who, out of respect for the constitution, choose to avoid judging the facts. Whatever the outcome, there is no doubt that impeachment will continue to undermine bipartisan cooperation on major issues, and that will not be good news for an already divided American politics.
Compared with previous attempts to impeach presidents in American history, ms pelosi's latest move is even more unremarkable. Since the Democrats regained control of the house of representatives in 2018, there have been increasing calls within the Democratic Party to impeach trump. With the election just around the corner, trump has seized on biden's son's economic problems in Ukraine. If the Democrats don't set off this time bomb, the consequences will be disastrous. In this sense, the political significance of this impeachment is far greater than the legal value it represents. For now, Mr. Trump has ordered no one in the administration to be subpoenaed by the house investigation. Critics say it is Mr Trump who is splitting the Democratic Party. Democrats only passed a resolution in the house judiciary committee on procedures and rules for conducting an impeachment investigation into trump, not the full house resolution to "consent to an impeachment investigation."
The trump team seized on the loophole and refused to cooperate with the investigation. The house of representatives voted 232-196 on October 31 to approve an impeachment investigation against President Donald trump. This is the first time the house of representatives has held a formal vote on the impeachment investigation.
For ms pelosi, impeachment would be the last straw in her political life. At stake is the preservation of the image and prestige she has cultivated over decades as a veteran of American politics. From 1976 to 1996, pelosi represented California as a member of the democratic national committee, during which she served as the chairman of the California Democratic Party from 1984 to 1987 when she was elected to the house of representatives. She served as the first female speaker of the house of representatives from 2007 to January 2011. For the first time in American history, the position was held by a woman. So when pelosi was sworn in in 2007, she was hailed as a landmark moment for women. In the 2018 midterm congressional elections, Democrats won the house of representatives, and pelosi was reelected speaker. Ms. Pelosi, now 79, wanted to retire three years ago, but decided to stay on for a few more years as a counterweight to Mr. Trump. This is the only one of the only three impeachment attempts to have been launched without a vote of the full house of representatives. House republican leader Kevin McCarthy called for a procedural challenge, asking pelosi to hold a full house vote.
Nancy pelosi, speaker of the us house of representatives, announced on September 24 that the house of representatives has officially opened an investigation into the impeachment of President Donald trump. The reason is that trump is suspected of violating the constitution by seeking political help from a foreign power. Pelosi began the third impeachment battle in U.S. history.
After being sworn in as speaker in 2007, pelosi stepped up her efforts to rein in mounting calls within her own party to impeach bush. Its speaker was once challenged by Cindy Sheehan, a prominent peace activist. Know to impeach President end is unclear, she decided to start impeachment trump's survey, perhaps on the one hand, is based on the current electoral process - if not while biden and popularity, the trump on top democratic candidate father and son said to abuse power for personal gains, so such as biden sentiment not line, again on the outside investigation method of the trump, convincing big lost.
(Picture Source:Baidu)
Mr Trump's supporters see ms pelosi as using constitutional authority to carry out a witch hunt and overstep procedures. But ms pelosi's experience in the house, as an evergreen democrat in the chamber, has been through one impeachment and one unimpeachment.
Mr. Trump's call with President zerensky of Ukraine took place in July, and the whistleblower sent the tip to congress in August. As speaker of the house of representatives, pelosi could not have been unaware of the tip-off, but she chose not to. Trump and his republican supporters in congress called it "hearsay." After public opinion in the United States continued to ferment, pelosi announced the formal initiation of the impeachment investigation on September 24. A "galvanised" Mr Trump released the text of the call with Mr Zelenski the next day. This text, which wanted to prove itself, basically proved the existence of the "deal". In this way, the "hearsay" was confirmed by trump himself as "nonsense". Subsequently, the house of representatives issued subpoenas and conducted intensive closed-door hearings to collect direct evidence of "tong umen".
As in the previous two cases, the President's supporters labeled impeachment a "witch hunt" and "partisan advantage." Unlike the two previous impeachment attempts, when the house of representatives called a full vote under the constitutional procedure, pelosi formally announced the impeachment investigation without going through that procedure.
